Skip to main content

Ontario fastest growing province. But public services get zip

Ontario's economy bounds to first among the provinces
Four of the big Canadian banks have come out with new forecasts for the Ontario economy and they all indicate the economy is improving.  

The fall in the price of oil (and, with it, the Canadian dollar) is paying off for Ontario.   

All four banks predict that Ontario will have the fastest growing provincial economy in 2015. 

And all implicitly suggest that the Ontario government's Fall Economic and Fiscal Review is now out of date. (See the chart  below comparing bank and government forecasts.)

On average the banks predict that the economy will grow 0.3% more more quickly in 2014 than the Ontario government predicted in its Fall Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review. Nominal growth (real growth and changes in market prices due to inflation) is predicted to grow half a percent faster.  Similarly, growth is predicted to exceed the government's forecast for 2015 as well, with real growth reaching 2.7% and nominal growth reaching 4.7%.  

By 2015, the new bank forecasts suggest nominal growth will be a little under one percent more than the government's older, fall forecast.

That would mean significant extra revenue for the Ontario government. One percent growth in nominal GDP could mean another $850 million dollars in revenue for Ontario government coffers.  

The recently announced federal government transfer payments to Ontario for 2015/16 (for equalization, health and social transfers) are also much higher than expected.  In fact,  about $450 million more than the $800 million increase the provincial government anticipated for all federal transfers to the province.

With the new growth, the banks are forecasting a significant increase in Ontario employment in 2015, with employment increasing 1.4%, up from just a 0.8% increase in 2014.  Consumer inflation (CPI) is also forecast to fall to 1.4% (down from the government projection of 2% consumer inflation).

The improved outlook from the banks is actually consistent with the government's thinking-- they too have suggested a significant upside for Ontario to lower oil prices and a lower Canadian dollar value.

Who will benefit? It won't be those who benefit from public services.  Despite an improving economy and extra federal cash, the Liberals are sticking to their hard talk on public services.    

Far from real growth, the plan is to cut public services. Indeed, the Liberal government's official plan is to make even sharper cuts in real public services, with 0.6% increase in program spending planned for 2015/16 ($700 million), about a quarter of the cost pressures from inflation and population growth.   

After that it only gets worse, with a minuscule 0.08% increase planned for 2016/17 ($100 million) and minus 0.7% in 2017/18 (minus $800 million).

And there are no signs of any move away from that plan - yet. 



2014
2015
2016
GDP Real
                           %
            %
           %
TD
2.3
2.6
2.3
Royal Bank
2.3
3.1
2.3
CIBC
2.1
2.8
2.9
BMO
2.1
2.4
2.2
Bank Average
2.20
2.73
2.43
Ontario Gov.
1.9
2.4
2.4




GDP Nominal



TD
4.2
4.1
4.4
Royal Bank
4.1
5.2
3.9
CIBC
3.8
4.9
5.1
BMO



Bank Average
4.03
4.73
4.47
Ontario Gov.
3.5
4.4
4.4




CPI



TD
2.3
1.7
2
Royal Bank
2.2
1.4
2.2
CIBC



BMO
2.3
1.2
2.2
Bank Average
2.27
1.43
2.13
Ontario Gov.
2.1
2
2




Employment



TD
0.8
1.3
1.1
Royal Bank
0.8
1.4
1.1
CIBC



BMO
0.8
1.5
1.1
Bank Average
0.80
1.40
1.10
Ontario Gov.
0.8
1.3
1.4

[Photo credit: Lending Memo]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…