Skip to main content

Collective bargaining in Ontario: New trends, new possibilities

New possibilities for collective bargaining in Ontario
New militancy: Recent strikes in the broader provincial public sector by 13,000 university teaching assistants and Community Care Access Centre employees (mostly RNs) suggest increased willingness of some broader public sector employees to strike to maintain and improve their working conditions.  Moreover the workers achieved some success in their strikes.  In the health care sector, the Health Minister, Eric Hoskins, felt it necessary to publicly call for the negotiations to be settled by interest arbitration.  Shortly after this, a leading arbitrator awarded both of the proposals (wage proposals) demanded by the union.

Both of the recent Teaching Assistant strikes at York and the University of Toronto put paid to the government's idea of "net zero" compensation increases, at least in the university sector, as the strikes made progress for those workers. Provincially coordinated teacher strikes are now underway to deal with the government's demands as well.  

Clearly there is now more appetite among public sector workers to change the bargaining climate.  Essential service workers (like hospital workers) can only benefit from this as interest arbitration (the method for resolving contract disputes for essential service workers who are not allowed to strike) follows established trends among comparable workers.

That said, the bargaining climate for provincial public sector workers remains challenging. 

Recent Bargaining Trends: Provincial broader public sector settlements averaged 1.3% in 2014, a significant improvement over 2013.  Nevertheless, they are lower than private sector settlements for the fifth year in a row, as private sector settlements averaged 1.8% in 2014, half a percent higher.

On an annual basis, private sector settlements have averaged 1.84% since 2010, while broader provincial public sector settlements have averaged 1.20%.  That means private sector settlements have averaged 0.64% more per year.

Federal public sector settlements have done better than provincial broader public sector settlements, but worse than municipal settlements and private sector settlements, with an annual average of 1.68% since 2010.  Stephen Harper has increased public sector wages more than the Ontario Liberals.  Even so, in 2014, federal settlements have averaged 1.5%, very similar to Ontario provincial broader public sector and municipal settlements. 

Broader provincial public sector settlements have fallen behind the annual inflation rate for the fifth year in a row.  Here the gap is larger, with Ontario inflation averaging 2.08% annually for 2010 through 2014.  That contrasts to the average annual provincial public sector wage settlement of 1.20%. 

In other words provincial public sector settlements have, on average, trailed the annual inflation rate by 0.88% each year for the last five years. That is a shortfall of almost 1% per year for five years ― quite a gap. 

This, of course, flies in the face of those who would like to portray provincial public sector workers as receiving rich settlements.  The reality for the last five years is that broader provincial public sector settlements have fallen well short of the annual inflation rate and that private sector settlements have been significantly higher. 

Municipal public sector settlements: Municipal unions have done a little better ― averaging 2% per year from 2010 through 2014 (although this is still short of the inflation average).  Municipal government settlements with police and fire have played a role here.  

Also notable ― the advantage of municipal settlements over provincial broader public sector settlements is at the lowest level since 2010:  municipal settlements in 2014 averaged 1.7%, only 0.4% higher than broader provincial public sector settlements.  In 2013, the gap was a huge 1.9%, as provincial public sector wage settlements hit a low point.  

2015: With settlement data only available for January and February, the general trend of 2014 continues: broader provincial public sector settlements have an average annual wage increase of 1.3%, municipal settlements average 1.7% and private sector settlements average 1.8%. Notably, the latter two are, at least, above the bank-predicted rate of inflation for 2015 (of 1.3%)  -- even if well short of the predicted rate for 2016 (2.4%). 

Government's bargaining position: The government's position in the 2015 Budget regarding the 787,000 workers in the "broader provincial public sector" (i.e. broader public sector workers excluding federal and municipal government employees) is as follows:  
Compensation costs must be addressed within Ontario’s existing fiscal framework, which does not include additional funding for wage increases. Any modest wage increases must be offset by other measures to create a net zero agreement, and all public-sector partners must continue to work together to control current and future compensation costs.  (My emphasis --DA.)
Just after this, however, the Budget brags that the government will have reduced pension expense for public sector workers by $2.3 billion per year by 2017/18, for a cumulative savings of $6 billion over the five years since 2012/13:  
In 2012, the Commission on the Reform of Ontario’s Public Services forecast that pension expense would increase by $1.1 billion over the period from 2012–13 to 2017–18. The current government forecast of pension expense projects a decline of $2.3 billion over the same period, resulting in a cumulative reduction of $10.3 billion compared to the Commission’s forecast. This represents a further improvement from the 2014 government forecast, which projected a decline of $1.5 billion over the same period and a cumulative reduction of $8.7 billion compared to the Commission’s forecast.

TABLE 2.1 Difference in Projected Pension Expense versus Commission on the Reform of Ontario's Public Services' Forecast
($ Billions)
Commission Report3.
Current Forecast3.
Difference in Forecast(0.1)(0.8)(1.2)(1.9)(2.8)(3.5)
Source: Ontario Treasury Board Secretariat.
The Drummond Commission used "pension expense" to suggest public sector pension expenses were rising too quickly, although the connection of pension expense to the actual cash cost of the pension is shaky.   The government's response was to all but require public sector employer contribution caps for five years.   

These pension expense "savings" just keep on getting bigger and bigger:  
  • In the 2013 Budget, they estimated a total savings of $2.1 billion from 2013/14 through 2017/18 (and $600 million this fiscal year alone).  
  • In the 2014 Budget, they estimated a savings of $4.3 billion from 2013/14 through 2017/18 (and $1 billion this fiscal year alone).  
  • Now in 2015, they estimate a total savings of $6 billion from 2013/14 through 2017/18 (and $1.2 billion this fiscal year alone).  
Elsewhere in the 2015 Budget, the government also suggests major savings for single employer public sector pension expenses.  

Decline in pension expense opens possibilities in Ontario collective bargaining

The results of five years of struggle:  Predictably, during the recession private sector workers took it on the chin, before recovering to a better bargaining position.  But, also predictably, a year after the recession had ended, the province started to use the recession and the new provincial deficit as an excuse to go after public sector workers.  

In the summer of 2010, the provincial government required unions to consult extensively with them on their goal of zero wage increases for two years. The unions, by and large, did not agree to those terms.  The Dalton McGuinty government stepped up its campaign in 2012 by demanding wage freezes, concessions, and then implemented legislation attacking free collective bargaining when public sector workers did not agree to those terms.  

This dramatic step up in their demands was political not fiscal.  In 2010, when the McGuinty government started its campaign for a wage freeze in the provincial public sector, citing the state of the public books.  At that time they had estimated deficits totaling $74.2 billion from 2009/10-2012/13.

Deficit (in billions of dollars)
2010 Budget
2013 January
Reduction in Deficit

However, these proved utterly unrealistic ― the real deficits by early 2013 were actually $16 billion less.

Despite the decline in the deficits, by the summer of 2012 the government increased their demands on broader public sector workers.  A wage freeze would no longer do ― now it had to be a wage freeze plus significant financial concessions (e.g. cuts to sick leave and retirement pay-outs).  The government claimed that their plan would save $8.8 billion over three years ― i.e. much less than what they had already paired from the deficits since they started their wage freeze campaign in 2010.

The government was quite prepared to attack free collective bargaining to get the concessions they desired, despite the fact that major unions opened bargaining with a proposal for a wage freeze ― a freeze which would have accounted for much of the government's savings goal.

But, fortunately, this new approach led to some significant, if very uneven, fight backs by working people that undermined the McGuinty government’s claim that it offered something different from the public sector union bashing of the previous Progressive Conservative government.  The popularity of the McGuinty government declined dramatically (aided by the privatized P3 gas plant scandal) and both McGuinty and Finance Minister Dwight Duncan quickly announced their resignations.

The new premier, Kathleen Wynne, kept the goal of zero compensation increases in the provincial public sector, but reduced the emphasis on concession demands and abandoned -- or at least temporarily moved away from -- the threat of legislative attacks on collective bargaining in the public sector. Whether the government sticks to the principles of free collective bargaining we shall soon see as the teacher strikes unfold.

Broader public sector wage settlements within the provincial government’s domain (i.e. public sector settlements excluding federal and municipal settlements) have significantly increased since 2013’s stingy 0.3% average annual settlement.  

But if they continue to improve will depend on the current struggle. Employers and right wingers saw the recession as a opportunity to set back unions -- and achieved some results (from their point of view). But the recent struggles by public sector workers suggests that their gains may only be short term -- the attacks have, in some cases, led to stronger public sector unions.

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.

The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…