Skip to main content

Hospital worker sick leave: too much or too little?



Ontario hospital workers are much less absent due to illness or disability than hospital workers Canada-wide.  In 2014, Ontario hospital workers were absent 10.2 days due to illness or disability, 2.9 days less than the Canada wide average – i.e. 22% less.  In fact, Ontario hospital workers have had consistently fewer sick days for years.

This is also true if absences due to family or personal responsibilities are included.

Statistics Canada data for the last fifteen years for Canada and Ontario are reported in the chart below, showing Ontario hospital workers are consistently off work less.

Assuming, Ontario accounts for about 38% of the Canada-wide hospital workforce, these figures suggest that the days lost due to illness of injury in Canada excluding Ontario are about 13.6 days per year ([13.6 x 0.68] + [10.2 x 0.38] = 13.1).

In other words, hospital workers in the rest of Canada are absent from work due to illness or disability 1/3 more than Ontario hospital workers. 


In fact, Canadian public sector workers and Canadian unionized workers are off sick about one quarter more than Ontario hospital workers (see chart below for absences for Canadian public sector and unionized workers). 

Obviously, hospital workers should not be working with sick patients if they themselves are sick. The much lower absence from work in Ontario hospitals raises some questions if the crack downs on sick leave by Ontario hospitals have gone too far.


Absences due to workplace injuries

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) provides data on Schedule 1 employers (i.e. those that are insured through WSIB and are not self-insured). Covered hospital employees have increased over the last 12 reported years, increasing from 176,000 to 205,000 covered employees (a 16.5% increase).

Over that time, despite the significant increase in covered employment, the number of allowed lost time claims has decreased from 3,379 in 2002 to 2,145 in 2013 ― that is a 37% drop. The decline in the number of allowed lost time claims began in about 2010 and has accelerated since then.

Interestingly, the lost time injury rates have declined for all industries over this period ― even more sharply. Hospital workers have gone from a little under the all-industry average to somewhat over the all-industry average. Notably, the injury rate in nursing homes is much higher, although it too is declining.

Hospitals have declined from a rate of 1.92 to a rate of 1.05, while all industries have declined from 2.10 to 0.95.
  In other words, hospitals had an injury rate that was 91.4% of all industries, and they now have an injury rate of 110.5% of the all industries rate.  

Meanwhile, workers in long term care facilities in Ontario have a sky high lost time injury rate - more than double the hospital rate and almost two and a half times the all industry rate.  Long Term Care workers and community members have been campaigning for years for more staffing time ("Time to Care"). Almost certainly, the hectic rush of long term care work contributes significantly to the very high lost time injury rate in that industry.  

Public sector and private sector absences 

Occasionally, public sector workers, like hospital employees, are attacked for the amount of absences relative to private sector workers.  A recent Statistics Canada report (“Understanding public–private sector differences in work absences”) reviews public sector ― private sector differences in leave due to illness, disability, or family and personal responsibilities, and sheds some light on these claims.


The report concludes that absences from work have remained ‘relatively stable in recent years’.
Average days lost per worker per year across several characteristics, 1997, 2011 and 2012


1997
2011
2012
days
Both sexes
7.4
9.3
9.3
Men
6.3
7.7
7.6
Women
9.1
11.4
11.4
Age group

15 to 19
4.6
6.5
6.0
20 to 24
5.0
5.9
6.1
25 to 34
6.2
7.8
7.9
35 to 44
7.6
8.8
9.0
45 to 54
8.9
10.3
10.2
55 to 64
10.9
13.2
12.4
65 and over
Note F:
10.2
10.5
Union coverage

Union member or covered by collective agreement
10.7
13.2
12.9
Non-unionized
5.6
7.5
7.5
Sector

Public
9.8
12.9
12.4
Private
6.7
8.2
8.3
Note F:  too unreliable to be published
Note:  Other personal and job characteristics are available in CANSIM tables 279-0029 to 279-0039Source:  Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, 1997, 2011 and 2012.

The Statistics Canada study does note that there is a significant difference between public sector and private sector absences from work.  In 2012, full-time workers in the private sector took 8.3 days off on average (6.7 for illness or disability plus 1.5 for personal or family responsibilities).  In contrast, full-time workers in the public sector took 12.4 days (10.5 days for illness or disability and 2.0 days for personal or family responsibilities).

However, the Statistics Canada report found that this was largely due to differences in the unionization, age, and gender of public sector and private sector workers.

Women workers, older workers, and unionized workers tend to have more absences (see chart on left) and women workers, older workers, and especially unionized workers are more commonly found in the public sector than the private sector.  (The study suggests that women have more absences as they have more family responsibilities and that older workers have more illness.  Presumably unionized workers have more absences because they are much more highly unionized and have bargained superior sick and family leave provisions.) 

Unionization alone accounts for over half (55%) of the difference in absence from work between the private sector and the public sector.  Indeed, unionized workers as a whole had more days absent in 2012 than public sector workers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…