Skip to main content

Ontario to cut funding for hospital infrastructure in half. Austerity bites

The Ontario government recently put out a release bragging that they will fund $50 million per year to renew existing hospital facilities. 
old Ontario hospital x-ray

However, in her September report the Auditor General reported that Ontario hospital funding is less than the renewal needs for existing hospitals. "The assessments of hospital facilities identified $2.7 billion dollars of renewal needs, requiring annual funding of $392 million to bring assets to what is considered good condition. However, since 2014/15 actual annual provincial funding has been $125 million..." 

In other words, the government has put out a release announcing that they are reducing hospital capital renewal funding -- from a level that was already only a fraction of what is needed to bring hospitals to good condition.

The release also brags that they will provide $12 billion over ten years for new hospital facilities (as distinct from funding to renew existing hospital facilities discussed above). That works out to about $1.2 billion a year -- but even this aspect of the announcement is also much less than it appears.

Over the previous five years (2011/12-2015/16) the government spent $14.8 billion in hospital infrastructure (as reported on an interim basis in the Budgets). That is very close to $3 billion a year.

So, in other words, the government is reporting that it will cut spending on hospital infrastructure by over 50% - or by about $1.7 billion per year.

It takes some chutzpah to put out a release bragging about your funding when you are actually cutting funding. 
Ten year plan for Ontario hospital facility funding


Source: Ontario Budget Papers (interim estimate from following year's Budget)

But it's even worse.  The Auditor General also noted: "Existing funding does not address significant pressures faced by ministries for new projects... the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care has received submissions for 37 major hospital projects totalling $11.9 billion dating back to 2005/06. These submissions were endorsed by Local Health Integration Networks as needed projects requiring funding. However, the Ministry did not put forward these projects for approval to Treasury Board as these initiatives could not be managed from within their existing budget allocation."

So even with much higher funding than they now propose, $11.9 billion in needed hospital infrastructure projects could not be done.  

Notably, even with the much higher infrastructure funding, hospitals raided operating funds for capital projects. The Auditor reports that in "the last five years, hospitals spent on average $45 million a year of operating funds on capital and other funding needs." 

Given this announcement, this transfer of funds from hospital services to hospital facilities looks set to intensify.  That's especially bad news when hospitals have seen their real funding for services cut for many years.

Ironically, this announcement comes just after an infrastructure obsessed Budget.  The 2016 Budget increased funding for infrastructure projects by over $3.3 billion compared to the previous year. 


Provincial funding of infrastructure 2016


Pictures: epicmoments Inside an abandoned hospital in Ontario. TGH Wikipedia. 

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…