Skip to main content

Ontario is aging as hospital funding falls behind

Funding for hospital services in 2015/16 was 25% more in the rest of Canada than in Ontario. Some have tried to downplay this, arguing that economies of scale should allow Ontario to provide hospital care more cheaply.  Notably, however, the World Health Organization dismisses the notion that economies of scale are a significant factor in hospital costs:

It is tempting to think that larger hospitals are more cost-effective
than smaller ones because of the operation of economies of scale.  
However, the evidence does not back up this belief.  While increasing
hospital size can cut costs for some specific procedures, such
economics are exhausted at a relatively small size.

In any case, with a population dispersed over a large geographic area, Ontario has scores of small hospitals, despite its large population.  Moreover, in other provinces, small hospitals are managed by larger regional health organizations, while in Ontario they are not.  If there were economies of scale in hospital services, such larger regional health organizations should achieve them — but the funding figures provide no evidence of that, quite the reverse.

Are there other, better demographic explanations of different hospital cost pressures?
In fact the key demographic factor suggests that Ontario hospital funding should be increasing, not decreasing, relative to the rest of Canada. 

While economies of scale are not very relevant to the issue of hospital funding, there is wide consensus that aging is a key factor.  So it is notable that as Ontario hospital funding fell behind the rest of Canada from the time the Liberals were elected, the median age in Ontario has changed from being less than the rest of Canada to now slightly more than the rest of Canada. 


In other words, as Ontario’s population got older relative to the rest of Canada, funding fell behind the rest of Canada.

This chart shows the changes in median age in Canada and in Ontario.  In 2003, when the Liberals were elected, Ontario median age was 0.6 years less than the Canadian median age.  But by 2015, it was 0.1 years higher than the Canadian median age (as Ontario is a significant portion of the “Canada” figures, the change between Ontario and the rest of Canada excluding Ontario is actually even larger).  

Bottom line:  Unlike the notion that hospital economies of scale should reduce cost pressures, aging is widely accepted as the key demographic determinant of funding cost pressures.  Despite this, hospital funding in Ontario fell far behind the rest of Canada over the same period as Ontario’s median age increased relative to the rest of Canada.   

Demographic factors suggest Ontario hospital funding should be increasing relative to the rest of Canada, not decreasing.

Comments

  1. What is your source for aging being a key demographic determinant of funding?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ross -- CIHI indicates that provincial health expenditures for 15-19 year olds was about $1500 in 2008, while it is about double that for 50-54 year olds, and about 16 times that for those 90 and older. The other demographic factor that I believe is particularly significant (within Canada) is personal income -- but I don't believe it has such a major effect.

    ReplyDelete
  3. CIHI places aging as a 1% per year cost driver for hospital services. Another demographic factor is population growth, which I believe has been growing by 1% per year in Ontario. The other cost drivers CIHI cites are increased utilization, health care inflation, and technology, i.e. non-demographic factors. See https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/health_care_cost_drivers_the_facts_en.pdf

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…