Skip to main content

Ontario is aging as hospital funding falls behind

Funding for hospital services in 2015/16 was 25% more in the rest of Canada than in Ontario. Some have tried to downplay this, arguing that economies of scale should allow Ontario to provide hospital care more cheaply.  Notably, however, the World Health Organization dismisses the notion that economies of scale are a significant factor in hospital costs:

It is tempting to think that larger hospitals are more cost-effective
than smaller ones because of the operation of economies of scale.  
However, the evidence does not back up this belief.  While increasing
hospital size can cut costs for some specific procedures, such
economics are exhausted at a relatively small size.

In any case, with a population dispersed over a large geographic area, Ontario has scores of small hospitals, despite its large population.  Moreover, in other provinces, small hospitals are managed by larger regional health organizations, while in Ontario they are not.  If there were economies of scale in hospital services, such larger regional health organizations should achieve them — but the funding figures provide no evidence of that, quite the reverse.

Are there other, better demographic explanations of different hospital cost pressures?
In fact the key demographic factor suggests that Ontario hospital funding should be increasing, not decreasing, relative to the rest of Canada. 

While economies of scale are not very relevant to the issue of hospital funding, there is wide consensus that aging is a key factor.  So it is notable that as Ontario hospital funding fell behind the rest of Canada from the time the Liberals were elected, the median age in Ontario has changed from being less than the rest of Canada to now slightly more than the rest of Canada. 


In other words, as Ontario’s population got older relative to the rest of Canada, funding fell behind the rest of Canada.

This chart shows the changes in median age in Canada and in Ontario.  In 2003, when the Liberals were elected, Ontario median age was 0.6 years less than the Canadian median age.  But by 2015, it was 0.1 years higher than the Canadian median age (as Ontario is a significant portion of the “Canada” figures, the change between Ontario and the rest of Canada excluding Ontario is actually even larger).  

Bottom line:  Unlike the notion that hospital economies of scale should reduce cost pressures, aging is widely accepted as the key demographic determinant of funding cost pressures.  Despite this, hospital funding in Ontario fell far behind the rest of Canada over the same period as Ontario’s median age increased relative to the rest of Canada.   

Demographic factors suggest Ontario hospital funding should be increasing relative to the rest of Canada, not decreasing.

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…