Skip to main content

Ontario government spending grows. But the deficit falls like a stone


Yesterday’s third quarter report from the Ministry of Finance indicates that their estimate of the deficit for 2016/17 fiscal year has fallen by $2.4 billion -- from $4.3 billion to $1.9 billion.

This despite the announcement of another $223 million in new spending increases for 2016/17.  If you recall, the government announced even more in-year spending increases in the fall for Hydro rebates and hospitals.  


Since the 2016/17 Budget, they have now increased program spending about $1.1 billion through in-year increases.  That is an in-year increase in program spending of 0.92%.  

This is quite unusual for a government that typically under-spends their budget.  

The new increased expenditures announced yesterday are mostly on a specific hospital based service and drugs:

·    Ontario Drug Benefit Program: an additional $106.0 million to address funding requirements for the Ontario Drug Benefit program.
·    Malignant Hematology including Stem Cell Transplants: an investment of $95.4 million to support additional capacity to provide stem cell transplants in Ontario, which require specialized facilities and staffing, including creating a new unit at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, as well as OHIP out-of-country costs for stem cell transplants that cannot be accommodated in Ontario.

Health spending is now forecast to be $347.6 million higher than forecast in the 2016/17 Budget. That's the biggest increase of any ministry -- although at 0.67% far from the biggest percentage increase of any ministry.   

Tempering these expense increases is the previously reported $381 M decline in interest expense on the debt. As a result, total expense is up $737 M.

Following an expert panel's report on pension accounting discussed in a previous note, the government is indeed sticking to its preferred accounting method for the teachers and civil servant pension plans, significantly reducing the debt and deficit.  With this, the key debt to GDP ratio is now scheduled to fall for a second year in a row -- hitting 38.3%.
 
The large majority of the in-year decrease in the deficit measured against the Fall Economic Statement is the reversion to the long held accounting practices for these pension plans.  

But this obscures the fact that since the Budget (which also used the government's preferred budget accounting method for the pension plans), there has been a dramatic increase in revenue thanks to increases in a variety of taxation categories.  The big gains were in corporate taxes (up $1.1 B since the Budget) and sales taxes (up $803 M).  Both of these categories have also seen significant increases since the Fall Economic Statement (very significant in the case of sales taxes)Income taxes are also up significantly since the Budget ($726 M) -- but the estimated increase is significantly less than in the Fall Economic Statement.

In total, revenue is up almost $400 million since the Fall Economic Statement and up $2.52 billion since the 2016/17 Budget.   That big increase in revenue largely explains the $2.4 billion reduction in the deficit since the Budget -- when the pension plans were accounted for on the same basis as this third quarter report. 

The government has gotten some favourable media about falling deficits through this third quarter report -- something I can't recall happening before from a usually forgotten report.  

But they are likely saving more good news for the upcoming Budget or the close out of the 2016/17 books with the Public Accounts in late September.  Those are higher profile announcements and much closer to the 2018 election.  

Bottom line: revenue is increasing, the deficit is falling, and the government has shown an uncharacteristic willingness to spend more in-year than budgeted. 

On the fiscal front, things are looking up – at least in the short term.  Some will benefit, but, as always, the question remains, who?  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about ...

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...