Skip to main content

More room for public spending in lead up to election

The 2016-17 Ontario Public Accounts came out yesterday – almost a month early. The Accounts finalize the books for 2016/17 and show that the deficit is down a further $500 million from the last estimate for 2016-17 (which was made in the spring in the 2017 Budget).  

The Shrinking Deficit: The deficit is now down below the billion dollar mark to $991 million.  That is a full $3.3 billion less than the estimate made in the 2016 Budget, continuing the long term trend by the Liberals to massively overestimate the deficit.  Contrary to those who have claimed the deficit was insurmountable, the real story is that it has been consistently overestimated for years.
    
Revenue wobbles: Revenue did beat the 2016 Budget estimate for 2016/17  -- but only by $2.2 billion, 1.6% more than projected. The spring 2017 Budget estimated that revenue would beat the 2016 Budget projection by a larger figure -- $2.64 billion, 2% more than projected (albeit with a somewhat different accounting methodology). So this is a bit of a come down. 

Total revenue increased by only 3.37% compared with 2015/16.  The main drag on revenue growth was the largest component of revenue -- tax revenue.  It increased by only 2.7%. 

This is a surprisingly modest increase given that the economy did significantly better than expected over the fiscal year. Nominal growth (the key driver of tax revenue) was better than expected, achieving 4.6% in 2016. The first quarter of 2017 (i.e. the last quarter of the 2016/17 fiscal year) was particularly impressive.  The province's first quarter 2017 economic accounts suggest nominal growth hit a very impressive 8% on an annualized basis (with real growth hitting an also impressive 4% annualized). The Canadian economy has continued to see strong growth in the second quarter of 2017. 

Spending Less than Expected: Expenses were $100 million lower than budgeted due to a $700 million lower than expected interest expense and $600 million in extra program expense. 

That is extra program spending of less than half a percent, i.e. not much. Given all the mid-year funding announcements made by the government starting in the fall of 2016, that may surprise some. But, as this government often under-spends its planned budgets, this very modest  program spending increase is pretty consistent with past practice.  

The health care budget got a $236 million in-year increase – mostly for hospitals (which we can take some credit for).  

Total program expenditures increased only 1.5% over 2015/16; health care expenditures increased 1.9%. That is well below the real cost pressures on public services of aging, population growth and inflation. Austerity was alive and well in 2016/17. 

The war with the AG continues: The Auditor General offered only a qualified opinion on the Public Accounts – due in part to the longstanding differences she has with the government over pension accounting (a difference that would add much to the deficit and debt).

The FAO misses, again: The Public Accounts provide further evidence that the Financial Accountability Office (FAO) estimates of the deficits are out of whack.  

Only a few months ago the FAO estimated (using the government’s pension  accounting method, not the Auditor's) the 2016-17 deficit as at $2.8 billion – i.e. 280% of the actual deficit. 

That is pretty much in line with the FAO's earlier gross overestimates.  I expect more  along these line from them when they release their long term fiscal forecast later this month -- hopefully they will at least adjust their base year estimate for 2016/17 now.

If you can't hammer public spending with the deficit, then what? The government continues to forecast balanced budgets for this year and the following two.  

The Progressive Conservatives wisely continue to pivot away from their previous excitement over the deficit  -- but continue to pivot towards complaints about the debt, despite the continued significant decline in debt to GDP that was achieved in 2016/17. Debt in 2016/17 was 1.4% less of the GDP than two years earlier.  

Ontario own source revenue to GDP


Debt charges to total revenue also continues to decline -- for the third year in a row:

Ontario debt load


Now is our best chance in years to bolster public services: All in all, Ontario continues to have more possibilities for public spending growth in the lead up to the provincial election in June. Now is the time to apply pressure.    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs).  With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.   But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second...