Skip to main content

More room for public spending in lead up to election

The 2016-17 Ontario Public Accounts came out yesterday – almost a month early. The Accounts finalize the books for 2016/17 and show that the deficit is down a further $500 million from the last estimate for 2016-17 (which was made in the spring in the 2017 Budget).  

The Shrinking Deficit: The deficit is now down below the billion dollar mark to $991 million.  That is a full $3.3 billion less than the estimate made in the 2016 Budget, continuing the long term trend by the Liberals to massively overestimate the deficit.  Contrary to those who have claimed the deficit was insurmountable, the real story is that it has been consistently overestimated for years.
Revenue wobbles: Revenue did beat the 2016 Budget estimate for 2016/17  -- but only by $2.2 billion, 1.6% more than projected. The spring 2017 Budget estimated that revenue would beat the 2016 Budget projection by a larger figure -- $2.64 billion, 2% more than projected (albeit with a somewhat different accounting methodology). So this is a bit of a come down. 

Total revenue increased by only 3.37% compared with 2015/16.  The main drag on revenue growth was the largest component of revenue -- tax revenue.  It increased by only 2.7%. 

This is a surprisingly modest increase given that the economy did significantly better than expected over the fiscal year. Nominal growth (the key driver of tax revenue) was better than expected, achieving 4.6% in 2016. The first quarter of 2017 (i.e. the last quarter of the 2016/17 fiscal year) was particularly impressive.  The province's first quarter 2017 economic accounts suggest nominal growth hit a very impressive 8% on an annualized basis (with real growth hitting an also impressive 4% annualized). The Canadian economy has continued to see strong growth in the second quarter of 2017. 

Spending Less than Expected: Expenses were $100 million lower than budgeted due to a $700 million lower than expected interest expense and $600 million in extra program expense. 

That is extra program spending of less than half a percent, i.e. not much. Given all the mid-year funding announcements made by the government starting in the fall of 2016, that may surprise some. But, as this government often under-spends its planned budgets, this very modest  program spending increase is pretty consistent with past practice.  

The health care budget got a $236 million in-year increase – mostly for hospitals (which we can take some credit for).  

Total program expenditures increased only 1.5% over 2015/16; health care expenditures increased 1.9%. That is well below the real cost pressures on public services of aging, population growth and inflation. Austerity was alive and well in 2016/17. 

The war with the AG continues: The Auditor General offered only a qualified opinion on the Public Accounts – due in part to the longstanding differences she has with the government over pension accounting (a difference that would add much to the deficit and debt).

The FAO misses, again: The Public Accounts provide further evidence that the Financial Accountability Office (FAO) estimates of the deficits are out of whack.  

Only a few months ago the FAO estimated (using the government’s pension  accounting method, not the Auditor's) the 2016-17 deficit as at $2.8 billion – i.e. 280% of the actual deficit. 

That is pretty much in line with the FAO's earlier gross overestimates.  I expect more  along these line from them when they release their long term fiscal forecast later this month -- hopefully they will at least adjust their base year estimate for 2016/17 now.

If you can't hammer public spending with the deficit, then what? The government continues to forecast balanced budgets for this year and the following two.  

The Progressive Conservatives wisely continue to pivot away from their previous excitement over the deficit  -- but continue to pivot towards complaints about the debt, despite the continued significant decline in debt to GDP that was achieved in 2016/17. Debt in 2016/17 was 1.4% less of the GDP than two years earlier.  

Ontario own source revenue to GDP

Debt charges to total revenue also continues to decline -- for the third year in a row:

Ontario debt load

Now is our best chance in years to bolster public services: All in all, Ontario continues to have more possibilities for public spending growth in the lead up to the provincial election in June. Now is the time to apply pressure.    

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.

The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…