Skip to main content

Has the Financial Accountability Office over-estimated the deficit once again?

Buried in this week's Financial Accountability Office (FAO) report on the Ontario government books is a very quiet admission that Ontario ran a surplus of $700 million in 2017/18 (when using the government's accounting method for pension surpluses and hydro).  Just a year ago, the FAO claimed there would be a deficit of $500 million.

 This $1.2 billion over-estimate is not surprising. The FAO has consistently cried wolf.   A year ago, they put the 2016/17 deficit at $2.8 billion (when using the government's accounting methods).   Now they put it at $1 billion with the same accounting methods.  

 Towards the end of the 2015/16 fiscal year they overestimated the deficit for that year by $3.3 billion to $5 billion more than they subsequently admitted.  Even after that fiscal year ended, they put it at $2.2 billion more than they later admitted.

 Now the FAO has changed its accounting methods (following the Auditor General) to claim a much higher deficit.  Accordingly it too forecasts much bigger deficits and a growing debt for years to come.  


To come back to balance (by 2025-26) the FAO suggests fairly harsh austerity -- worse than we experienced from 2010/11-2017/18.  

They note that this will mean the province would have to lower spending by $15 billion by 2025-26. That’s an 8% cut.  (Note this $15 billion cut is compared to the 3.5% spending increases they estimate are required to maintain existing services, based on population growth and inflation.)

The FAO, like many economists, forecast slowing economic growth in Ontario – with it coming in over the medium term at a modest 1.9%.   The FAO does not believe the province can grow its way out of deficit and growing debt.  And truly, the new low growth of developed capitalist nations (like Canada) does create problems -- especially given that the affluent seize much of the new wealth created.  

Even with the government’s accounting method, it will take several years of austerity to get back to balance by 2024-25.  The adoption of the Auditor General’s accounting methods for pension surpluses and hydro will require more austerity, barring new revenue streams  -- something the FAO hardly even contemplates, like most of the establishment . 

We are being set up for more austerity. If successful, this will mean very difficult bargaining and reduced public services. 

After the recession of the early 1990s, public sector workers and public services took punishment for almost a decade before being able to make up some of those losses between 2001 and 2008/9 (when the next recession occurred and the cycle of cuts began again). 

The new accounting could be a useful tool for the right wing to prevent attempts by working people to recoup the losses they have experienced since 2008/9.  It would provide a new right wing government justification for attacks on public services -- even before the next recession.  

Once that next recession occurs (and it is almost past due even now) government revenue will plummet and public services will be even deeper in hock. 

The problem for the right, however, is, if working people never get a chance to recoup their losses, social stability comes into question -- something we are already seeing in the developed capitalist world. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...
Post a Comment
Read more

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...
Post a Comment
Read more

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs).  With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.   But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second...
Post a Comment
Read more