Skip to main content

PC Government Plans Many More Health Care Cuts


The Financial Accountability Office (FAO) Budget and Economic review has identified planned government spending savings that come via [1] announced program changes (program cuts like the government’s cut to OHIP+), [2] announced efficiency targets (identified areas where the government hopes it will find savings without service cuts), and [3] cuts that have not yet been announced by the government.

While the government has identified some spending cuts of type 1 or 2 above, the government’s spending plan needs billions of dollars in extra, unidentified and unannounced cuts to meet its savings targets according to the FAO (type 3 cuts, as above). For health care, this amounts to $5.2 billion in unidentified and unannounced cost savings needed for the government’s health spending plan to work in 2023-24.  Even though the cuts identified to date have been major and painful, $5.2 billion is many times more than the cuts announced and implemented to date. [1]

The unidentified and unannounced health cuts exist even for this fiscal year – but they become a much bigger issue as the years go along until they account for $5.2 billion out of $8 billion in total health care cuts required by the government’s fiscal plan in 2023-24:

Other ministries also must make billions of dollars in unidentified cuts for the government to meet its spending plan. In two years the government plans to implement some $5.9 billion in cuts that are currently unannounced (in addition to the $5.7 billion already announced for that year).  And it gets much worse in the years after that. Here’s the chart for all program spending:

The FAO notes the cuts are [a] similar to the level of cuts in the 1990s, and [b] equal to about 10% in real terms for all program spending – about a $1,100 per person cut (in constant dollars) for all program spending.


Ontario already has the lowest provincial government program spending, over $2,000 less per person than the Canadian average:

Source: FAO, February 2019, Comparing Ontario’s Fiscal Position with Other Provinces

While the cuts imposed by the Mike Harris Progressive Conservative government were particularly painful in its first Budget, they lasted only a couple of years before that government was required to reverse its policy in its third year, when it recognised reality and increased program spending by 8%. The new Progressive Conservative government plans at least five years of austerity (there are no reports from the government yet about what it plans to do in years six and beyond).

The FAO also reveals that the government’s plan also has some unannounced tax changes that will reduce revenue by $0.2 billion in 2020-21, and by $3.6 billion in 2023-24.  So, not only has the PC government introduced billions in tax cuts this year, we will also get more, as yet unannounced, tax cuts in the years ahead. These revenue cuts delay the achievement of a balanced budget, deepen the provincial debt, and require more cuts to social programs. And these tax cuts are planned even as the government continues to claim  -- with shameless hypocrisy -- that the program cuts it is imposing are required by the province's fiscal situation. 

Revenue Impact of Unannounced Tax Policy Changes
Bottom line – The government must identify and implement very major cuts for health care (and all social programs) over the next five years if it keeps to its Budget plan. 
Local communities need to speak out and require this government to change direction—just as the previous PC government did.



[1] Much of the rest of the savings ($2.7 billion in 2023-24) are simply government ‘efficiency targets’ – i.e. savings where the government has identified an area where they wish to reduce spending.  But these efficiency targets may not be much more than wishful thinking (like their claim that they will save a billion dollars annually by taking over the health care supply chain, or their claim they will cut health agency spending by $350 million with the creation of Ontario Health, or their plan to cut $250 million in health worker overtime, sick leave, premium payment, and etc. by 2021-22).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a