Skip to main content

Contracting-out hospital transcription services. Shared service corporations expand scope

Hospital 'shared service corporations' are popping up all across Ontario to take over support services for Ontario hospitals.  Most of these are not-for-profit corporations owned by the area hospitals.  Sometimes the shared service corporation delivers the hospital support service, other times it contracts the service out for the hospital to a 3rd party. 

The main focus to date for the hospital shared service corporations  has been on the supply chain and back office services. The process has gotten a lot of cash support from the Ontario Ministry of Finance and the government has bragged about it as one of the main ways it is (allegedly) making  the public sector more efficient.  It's part of the centralization of hospital services.

The shared services corporations are now slowly increasing their reach into other areas of hospital work.

The latest development is that COPHA (a fairly new shared services corporation for hospitals in central Ontario) has overseen the contracting-out of transcription work for three central Ontario hospitals. The winning bidder for the contract is Accentus.


Accentus claims that they hire transcriptionists and that they “are 100% Canadian staffed and operated” (In Britain, some hospital transcription work went overseas, causing concern about the use of public dollars.)

The three hospitals affected to date are not CUPE hospitals.  But other COPHA hospitals are CUPE organized, and it’s possible COPHA may contract-out transcriptionist work of other hospitals in the future.

In any event, it sounds quite possible that other hospitals, or other hospital shared service corporations, may get in on contracting-out transcriptionist work. -- Doug

 
dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

  1. budget wise yeah it is good and really help to many people to have a job in medical transcriptionist in that area.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is not good budget-wise for the in-hospital medical transcriptionists who were paid a living wage and had benefits and are out of a job, unless they work for Accentus and make $10/hour without benefits. This is from experience!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I used to work for Accentus and it was horrid. You are given NO support whatsoever from supervisors or from IT. Training? Done on your own unpaid.

    What galled me is the fact that my earnings were below minimum wage - an average of about $6.00/hour. That is because Accentus frequently ran out of work (too many MTs hired), word expanders don't work with the Accentus platform, and computer issues were frequent.

    Yes, hospitals shave their budgets. But the Accentus MTs do not get any benefits and make nowhere near a living wage.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very interesting Tess. That I think will be the story for a lot of the privatization proposed for our hospitals.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…