Skip to main content

Contracting-out hospital transcription services. Shared service corporations expand scope

Hospital 'shared service corporations' are popping up all across Ontario to take over support services for Ontario hospitals.  Most of these are not-for-profit corporations owned by the area hospitals.  Sometimes the shared service corporation delivers the hospital support service, other times it contracts the service out for the hospital to a 3rd party. 

The main focus to date for the hospital shared service corporations  has been on the supply chain and back office services. The process has gotten a lot of cash support from the Ontario Ministry of Finance and the government has bragged about it as one of the main ways it is (allegedly) making  the public sector more efficient.  It's part of the centralization of hospital services.

The shared services corporations are now slowly increasing their reach into other areas of hospital work.

The latest development is that COPHA (a fairly new shared services corporation for hospitals in central Ontario) has overseen the contracting-out of transcription work for three central Ontario hospitals. The winning bidder for the contract is Accentus.


Accentus claims that they hire transcriptionists and that they “are 100% Canadian staffed and operated” (In Britain, some hospital transcription work went overseas, causing concern about the use of public dollars.)

The three hospitals affected to date are not CUPE hospitals.  But other COPHA hospitals are CUPE organized, and it’s possible COPHA may contract-out transcriptionist work of other hospitals in the future.

In any event, it sounds quite possible that other hospitals, or other hospital shared service corporations, may get in on contracting-out transcriptionist work. -- Doug

 
dallan@cupe.ca

Comments

  1. budget wise yeah it is good and really help to many people to have a job in medical transcriptionist in that area.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is not good budget-wise for the in-hospital medical transcriptionists who were paid a living wage and had benefits and are out of a job, unless they work for Accentus and make $10/hour without benefits. This is from experience!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I used to work for Accentus and it was horrid. You are given NO support whatsoever from supervisors or from IT. Training? Done on your own unpaid.

    What galled me is the fact that my earnings were below minimum wage - an average of about $6.00/hour. That is because Accentus frequently ran out of work (too many MTs hired), word expanders don't work with the Accentus platform, and computer issues were frequent.

    Yes, hospitals shave their budgets. But the Accentus MTs do not get any benefits and make nowhere near a living wage.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very interesting Tess. That I think will be the story for a lot of the privatization proposed for our hospitals.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs).  With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.   But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second...