Skip to main content

Expert: we are vastly underestimating C. Difficile colonization

"I think we are vastly underestimating the number of people colonized by the C. difficile bacteria.  The statistics say something like 3% to 5%. I think that is much lower than what is actually out there,"  says the infectious-control director at the Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, Dr. Doug Sider.   


"There are healthy people who are carrying the bacteria and don't know it," Sider noted.  Those people could unwittingly carry the bacteria into a hospital -- and trigger an outbreak.  That is reason enough to take infection control measures seriously, he added.



The agency advises hospitals on infection and outbreak control. 


Some factors, like the physical space and design of a hospital, are difficult to control.  Older hospitals are cramped, crowded, and have few options to isolate patients, Dr. Sider suggested.  


Comments

  1. Dr. Sider says it is difficult to control C. Difficile in older hospitals where it is cramped and congested.....why then are they continuously cutting hospital beds as they have across Niagara which will only aggravate the problem? Incidentally Niagara is where they have had a serious epidemic of C. Difficile and the coroner may have to make an investigation.

    Pat Scholfield

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is clearly an important issue; I hope it receives the media attention it deserves.

    Incidentally, it *can* happen that health authorities screw up with near-catastrophic consequences. There was a crisis a few months ago in S. Korea when agricultural authorities were not aggressive enough in vaccinating against foot-and-mouth disease. Then an epidemic broke out. Thousands of animals were slaughtered. More than this, because the crisis was a "surprise", I read reports of animals being buried alive (e.g., by bulldozer), which in turn caused psych trauma for the workers involved. Finally, the farmers affected took a big hit financially.

    I realize this is an example from agriculture. Nevertheless, it all could have been avoided; my understanding is the vaccine for foot-and-mouth is quite effective. In the case of antibiotic-proof bacteria, one would think precautions should be taken on an entirely different scale of strenuousness. God knows what will happen if virulant bacteria go epidemic.

    An ounce of prevention..............

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …