Skip to main content

Expert: we are vastly underestimating C. Difficile colonization

"I think we are vastly underestimating the number of people colonized by the C. difficile bacteria.  The statistics say something like 3% to 5%. I think that is much lower than what is actually out there,"  says the infectious-control director at the Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, Dr. Doug Sider.   


"There are healthy people who are carrying the bacteria and don't know it," Sider noted.  Those people could unwittingly carry the bacteria into a hospital -- and trigger an outbreak.  That is reason enough to take infection control measures seriously, he added.



The agency advises hospitals on infection and outbreak control. 


Some factors, like the physical space and design of a hospital, are difficult to control.  Older hospitals are cramped, crowded, and have few options to isolate patients, Dr. Sider suggested.  


Comments

  1. Dr. Sider says it is difficult to control C. Difficile in older hospitals where it is cramped and congested.....why then are they continuously cutting hospital beds as they have across Niagara which will only aggravate the problem? Incidentally Niagara is where they have had a serious epidemic of C. Difficile and the coroner may have to make an investigation.

    Pat Scholfield

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is clearly an important issue; I hope it receives the media attention it deserves.

    Incidentally, it *can* happen that health authorities screw up with near-catastrophic consequences. There was a crisis a few months ago in S. Korea when agricultural authorities were not aggressive enough in vaccinating against foot-and-mouth disease. Then an epidemic broke out. Thousands of animals were slaughtered. More than this, because the crisis was a "surprise", I read reports of animals being buried alive (e.g., by bulldozer), which in turn caused psych trauma for the workers involved. Finally, the farmers affected took a big hit financially.

    I realize this is an example from agriculture. Nevertheless, it all could have been avoided; my understanding is the vaccine for foot-and-mouth is quite effective. In the case of antibiotic-proof bacteria, one would think precautions should be taken on an entirely different scale of strenuousness. God knows what will happen if virulant bacteria go epidemic.

    An ounce of prevention..............

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a