Skip to main content

Expert: we are vastly underestimating C. Difficile colonization

"I think we are vastly underestimating the number of people colonized by the C. difficile bacteria.  The statistics say something like 3% to 5%. I think that is much lower than what is actually out there,"  says the infectious-control director at the Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, Dr. Doug Sider.   


"There are healthy people who are carrying the bacteria and don't know it," Sider noted.  Those people could unwittingly carry the bacteria into a hospital -- and trigger an outbreak.  That is reason enough to take infection control measures seriously, he added.



The agency advises hospitals on infection and outbreak control. 


Some factors, like the physical space and design of a hospital, are difficult to control.  Older hospitals are cramped, crowded, and have few options to isolate patients, Dr. Sider suggested.  


Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJune 16, 2011 at 11:39 AM

    Dr. Sider says it is difficult to control C. Difficile in older hospitals where it is cramped and congested.....why then are they continuously cutting hospital beds as they have across Niagara which will only aggravate the problem? Incidentally Niagara is where they have had a serious epidemic of C. Difficile and the coroner may have to make an investigation.

    Pat Scholfield

    ReplyDelete
  2. Finn HarvorJune 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM

    This is clearly an important issue; I hope it receives the media attention it deserves.

    Incidentally, it *can* happen that health authorities screw up with near-catastrophic consequences. There was a crisis a few months ago in S. Korea when agricultural authorities were not aggressive enough in vaccinating against foot-and-mouth disease. Then an epidemic broke out. Thousands of animals were slaughtered. More than this, because the crisis was a "surprise", I read reports of animals being buried alive (e.g., by bulldozer), which in turn caused psych trauma for the workers involved. Finally, the farmers affected took a big hit financially.

    I realize this is an example from agriculture. Nevertheless, it all could have been avoided; my understanding is the vaccine for foot-and-mouth is quite effective. In the case of antibiotic-proof bacteria, one would think precautions should be taken on an entirely different scale of strenuousness. God knows what will happen if virulant bacteria go epidemic.

    An ounce of prevention..............

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations...
Post a Comment
Read more

The hospital crisis: No capacity, no plan, no end

While Canada has achieved universal public healthcare coverage, that does not mean conservative forces have given up trying to erode that coverage and expand corporate care where it does not currently exist. The battle has become particularly intense in Ontario under the Ford Progressive Conservative government, which is implementing serious cuts to the level of care and moving to bring in for-profit mini-hospitals. Inadequate Staffing.   Less and less of hospital spending is on staff.   Employee compensation as a share of hospital expenditures has consistently shrunk in Ontario. This is not some immutable law of hospital development.  It is in stark contrast with the rest of Canada, where compensation has become a larger share and now accounts for 67.1%. Hospitals in provinces other than Ontario now have 18 percent more staff per capita than hospitals in Ontario. Overall, if Ontario had the same staffing capacity as the other provinces and territories, there would be another...
Post a Comment
Read more

The long series of failures of private clinics in Ontario

For many years, OCHU/CUPE has been concerned the Ontario government would transfer public hospital surgeries, procedures and diagnostic tests to private clinics. CUPE began campaigning in earnest against this possibility in the spring of 2007 with a tour of the province by former British Health Secretary, Frank Dobson, who talked about the disastrous British experience with private surgical clinics. The door opened years ago with the introduction of fee-for-service hospital funding (sometimes called Quality Based Funding). Then in the fall of 2013 the government announced regulatory changes to facilitate this privatization. The government announced Request for Proposals for the summer of 2014 to expand the role of "Independent Health Facilities" (IHFs).  With mass campaigns to stop the private clinic expansion by the Ontario Health Coalition the process slowed.   But it seems the provincial Liberal government continues to push the idea.  Following a recent second...
Post a Comment
Read more