Skip to main content

Will PCs focus their attack on essential service workers?

Tim Hudak and the Progressive Conservatives may be taking Christina Blizzard's suggestion that they trim their message and focus on attacking public sector "entitlements".    His response to the Toronto Star's dismissal of the PC municipal program was to attack public sector union settlements and interest arbitration:

"Dalton McGuinty’s broken arbitration system has cost municipalities hundreds of million of dollars for excessive wage settlements that hamstring local leaders and burden families who pay the bills.For nearly eight years, Dalton McGuinty has handed out unsustainable collective agreements, which set the benchmark for arbitrations with municipal public sector workers. ....On Oct. 6, Ontario families will face a clear choice between more of Dalton McGuinty downloading the cost of his broken arbitration system onto municipalities, or an Ontario PC government that will provide families with relief."
Hudak and the PCs may be unaffected by reality, but, for the record, public sector wage settlements (through collective bargaining and interest arbitration) are currently at half the rate of inflation.  For this year and last, they have fallen behind private sector settlements.

Will this approach become a major focus of the PC campaign? Finding scapegoats for economic problems among working people is nothing new for them.  In fact they tried, unsuccessfully, to bias the interest arbitration process the last time they were in government.

The odd part of this crusade is that it particularly targets police officers, who, as essential service workers, are required to settle contract disputes through interest arbitration, and who have done better than most labour unions with their wage settlements.

What has Tim Hudak got against the police?
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousAugust 31, 2011 at 11:40 AM

    You aren't going to like this Doug, but the arbitration system is broken. There is no way that policemen in Niagara should be paid the same as policemen in Toronto, where the cost of living is substantially lower. The arbitration system does not take this factor into consideration and should. Average income of the area where the policeman serves should also be part of the equation. Public sector CEO and administrative salaries should also be modified based on these factors. Call it shared sacrifice.....but everybody has to have some skin in the game.

    Pat

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Huge cuts in public sector wages predicted

The Ontario Financial Accountability Office (FAO)   says  that, with inflation, real wages in the public sector will decline 11.3% over the three year period  2021/2 - 2023/4 .  This would radically deepen the trend towards lower wages during the last ten years.   The FAO reports that since 2011, the average annual salary for the Ontario public sector employees (defined here as employees of schools, colleges, provincial government, provincial agencies, and hospitals) has increased by $10,385   -- or 1.6 per cent on average annually.  This is the lowest increase of all the sectors and lower than inflation, which averaged 1.8 per cent per year. Over the ten years that would be about a 2% pay cut.   The FAO reports that wage settlements were the lowest in the provincial public sector over the last decade:   Hospital Wages Especially Challenged: The FAO predicts hospital wages will increase even less than in the public sector  -- just ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Too many public sector workers in Ontario?

Opponents of public services often try to portray the public sector as having grown disproportionately.  In fact, since 1976, the number of public sector employees has not quite kept pace with the population. In 1976, the number of public sector employees in Ontario  as reported by Statistics Canada averaged 830,800.  By 2012, the number had increased to 1,330,700 -- a 60.2% increase.  That sounds like significant growth -- true. But the population has increased  from 8,413,779 in 1976 to 13,505,900 in 2012, a 60.5% increase.   In other words, population growth has run slightly ahead of the growth in public sector employment.     In 1976, close to 10% of the population worked in the public sector.  It stayed pretty much this way until the Mike Harris government came to power when it dipped below 9%.  It returned close to the historical range in the last six years or so, declining in 2012 to below the 1976 averag...
16 comments
Read more

Are health care administrative expenses out of control in Ontario?

The Progressive Conservative government has justified its health restructuring plans with the claim that administrative expenses are much higher in Ontario than in Canada.  When introducing the reforms, health minister Christine Elliott  claimed , “Over the last five years, Ontario has spent 30% more than the Canadian average in administrative expenses on its health care system.”   Elliott did not indicate her source of information. Presumably, however, the Progressive Conservatives are referring to the CIHI simplified and user friendly “ Your Health System ” graphs. Those graphs show “administrative expenses” in Ontario at 5.8% in Ontario while it is 4.5% in Canada.   This CIHI measure is actually fairly narrowly defined. It is the percentage of “the legal entity’s” total expenses associated with the administrative, finance, human resources and communications functional centres. However “the legal entity” used for this estimate is [1] only...
Post a Comment
Read more