Skip to main content

Minister of Health opposes more hospital beds

Sun news article yesterday led with the (correct) observation that "Ontario’s plan to spend billions of tax dollars on hospital construction will not significantly increase the number of beds". Ontario Health Minister Deb Matthews countered as follows :

”It’s not about more beds. In many cases that’s not what the need is. It’s for modern up-to-date emergency departments, operating rooms. The rooms themselves, the patient rooms, in the old hospitals, simply do not meet today’s infection control standards, so the new hospitals have far more single rooms which will prevent things like C. difficile infection...We’ve also offset it (i.e. 18,500 hospital bed cuts -- DA) by more than 10,000 long-term care beds and beds in other settings outside of acute care hospitals.  So there are a lot more beds now than there were but they’re not in acute care hospitals and that’s actually a move in the right direction.”
There are a number of problems with these arguments. Most basically, not all hospital beds are acute care beds.  Far from it.  In fact, there is a major need to develop more non-acute care hospital beds.  But more of that later.  

Second, there is a need for more single patient hospital rooms to deal  with superbug infections, so, if that is what the Minister is getting at in her reference to old hospitals not meeting infection control standards, good!  But there is also expert evidence that superbug infections are connected to high hospital bed occupancy.  And here there has long been nothing but silence from the Ministry.  

Third, far from being an adequate response to hospital bed cuts, the increase in long term care beds only offsets the rapid growth in the relevant population.   In fact, the McGuinty government has been moving away from creating new long term care beds  -- in contrast with the policy of the previous  government.   Moreover, ICES reports that in the six years between 2002-/3 and 2008/9 the number of people in Ontario over 85 increased 36.9%.  That one age group accounts for more than half  of the people in LTC facilities in Ontario.   So it is very little surprise that the wait times for long term care beds have sky-rocketed.

Finally, long term care isn't designed to get people back into their homes.  LTC facilities are homes for people who are no longer able to take care of themselves despite any medical intervention.  LTC facilities must expand to take care of  the growing segment of the population that finds themselves in that predicament.  But LTC facilities do not provide curative beds -- and people only rarely return to their homes once they enter them.  

So to the extent the government does actually want to return people to their homes (as they endlessly claim) they need hospitals beds. That is where people get cured -- or at least made well enough so that, with increased home care, they can return to their homes.  

Very few hospital 'ALC' patients are waiting for home care, but many are waiting for rehabilitation or chronic care in the hospital.  When they get that, then, perhaps they will be able to go home.  We need improved hospital capacity and more home care hours so that more people can go home once they are well enough.

Unfortunately, if the government sticks to its funding plan, we are going to get less of both. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.





Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 


No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

Six more problems with Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

The Auditor General (AG) has again identified issues in her annual reportwhich reflect problems with Ontario health care capacity and privatization.   First, here are six key problems with the maintenance of the 16 privatized P3 ("public private partnership") hospitals in Ontario:
There are long-term ongoing disputes with privatized P3 contractors over the P3 agreements, including about what is covered by the P3  (or “AFP” as the government likes to call them) contract.The hospitals are required to pay higher than reasonable rates tothe P3 contractor for  maintenance work the contractor has deemed to be outside of the P3 contract. Hospitals are almost forced to use P3 contractors to do maintenance work the contractors deem outside of the P3 contract or face the prospect of transferring the risk associated with maintaining the related hospital assets from the private-sector company back to the hospitalP3 companies with poor perf…