Skip to main content

Liberals prevent public reporting of failed private clinics

Queen's Park in Darkness (Grant MacDonald)
Yesterday I fumed about the gall of one academic who claimed that privatized P3s (public private partnerships) had actually increased public transparency.

Even more evidence came today that privatization leads to a lack of transparency.  Not only is the Ontario government turning more surgeries and procedures over to private clinics, they have contracted out the oversight of these outfits to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.

Today, the Toronto Star reports that the College of Physicians claims that legislation passed by the Liberals putting the College in charge of inspections of these clinics, also prevents the College from actually telling the public which clinics are providing sub-standard care!  "We are not allowed to discuss the failed premises" says the College president, Dr. Bob Byrick.  As a result, we do not even know where the clinics are located. It remains unclear if even the Ministry of Health & LTC is told which clinics are failing.

Of the 251 clinics inspected, nine clinics failed to pass the test outright and another 64 others passed only with conditions.  One hundred and seventy-eight passed.   In other words, 29% of private clinics are substandard in some way.  Now wouldn't you like to know which is which?

College of Physicians (Grant MacDonald)
The Star notes that the report doesn't say whether the failed clinics are still open, identify the doctors who work in them, or reveal if any of those doctors face disciplinary action.

Perhaps the only good news is that the College report claims that "If a premises receives an inspection grade of 'fail' members of the College are prevented  from performing the regulated procedures that could put the public at risk." Good to know -- but too narrow to be reassuring.

While some might feel the government has put the Colonel in charge of the hen house, even this miserable level of inspection and public reporting is an improvement. The College report brags that prior to 2010 "no organization in Ontario had the authority to regulate these out-of hospital premises."  Indeed, the College sees the inspections as a big achievement: “This program is a real success story for quality improvement and public protection in Ontario,”said Dr. Rocco Gerace, College Registrar.

The College does at least claim that it wants to increase transparency of the program "by facilitating information sharing with the public regarding the results of premises inspections. The College is currently exploring how this can be achieved." But what this might mean remains unclear.

The push for at least some oversight of private clinics began after a Krista Styland died after undergoing liposuction at a private clinic in 2007.


Popular posts from this blog

Ontario long-term care staffing falls far short of other provinces

CUPE and others are campaigning for a legislated minimum average of four worked hours of nursing and personal care per resident per day in long-term care (LTC) facilities.  New research indicates that not only is LTC underfunded in Ontario, it is also understaffed compared to the other provinces. 
LTC staffing falls short:  The latest data published by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (and based on a mandatory survey undertaken by Statistics Canada) indicates that staffing at long-term care (LTC) facilities falls far short of other provinces. 
Part of this is driven by a low level of provincial funding for LTC.

Ontario has 0.575 health care full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) per bed staffed and in operation.[1]  The rest of Canada reports 0.665 health care FTEs.[2] The rest of Canada has 15.7% more health care staff per bed staffed and in operation than Ontario.[3] 

No other province reports fewer LTC health care staff per resident (or per bed) than Ontario.[4]

Occupancy r…

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).   

For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.  But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending. 

Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period.

So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more than they have ann…

Health care funding falls, again

Real provincial government health care funding per-person has fallen again this year in Ontario, the third year in a row.  Since 2009 real funding per-person has fallen 2.6% -- $63 per person. 

Across Canada real per person funding is in its fourth consecutive year of increase. Since 2009, real provincial funding across Canada is up $89 -- 3.6%.
In fact the funding gap between Ontario and Canada as a whole has gown consistently for years (as set out below in current dollars).

Ontario funds health care less than any other province -- indeed, the province that funds health care the second least (B.C.) provides $185 more per person per year, 4.7% more.  
Provincial health care spending in the rest of Canada (excluding Ontario) is now  $574 higher per person annually than in Ontario. 

 Ontario has not always provided lower than average health care funding increases-- but that has been the general pattern since 2005.
Private expenditures on health care have exceeded Ontario government increases …