Skip to main content

Liberals prevent public reporting of failed private clinics

Queen's Park in Darkness (Grant MacDonald)
Yesterday I fumed about the gall of one academic who claimed that privatized P3s (public private partnerships) had actually increased public transparency.

Even more evidence came today that privatization leads to a lack of transparency.  Not only is the Ontario government turning more surgeries and procedures over to private clinics, they have contracted out the oversight of these outfits to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.

Today, the Toronto Star reports that the College of Physicians claims that legislation passed by the Liberals putting the College in charge of inspections of these clinics, also prevents the College from actually telling the public which clinics are providing sub-standard care!  "We are not allowed to discuss the failed premises" says the College president, Dr. Bob Byrick.  As a result, we do not even know where the clinics are located. It remains unclear if even the Ministry of Health & LTC is told which clinics are failing.

Of the 251 clinics inspected, nine clinics failed to pass the test outright and another 64 others passed only with conditions.  One hundred and seventy-eight passed.   In other words, 29% of private clinics are substandard in some way.  Now wouldn't you like to know which is which?

College of Physicians (Grant MacDonald)
The Star notes that the report doesn't say whether the failed clinics are still open, identify the doctors who work in them, or reveal if any of those doctors face disciplinary action.

Perhaps the only good news is that the College report claims that "If a premises receives an inspection grade of 'fail' members of the College are prevented  from performing the regulated procedures that could put the public at risk." Good to know -- but too narrow to be reassuring.

While some might feel the government has put the Colonel in charge of the hen house, even this miserable level of inspection and public reporting is an improvement. The College report brags that prior to 2010 "no organization in Ontario had the authority to regulate these out-of hospital premises."  Indeed, the College sees the inspections as a big achievement: “This program is a real success story for quality improvement and public protection in Ontario,”said Dr. Rocco Gerace, College Registrar.

The College does at least claim that it wants to increase transparency of the program "by facilitating information sharing with the public regarding the results of premises inspections. The College is currently exploring how this can be achieved." But what this might mean remains unclear.

The push for at least some oversight of private clinics began after a Krista Styland died after undergoing liposuction at a private clinic in 2007.

Popular posts from this blog

Deficit? Public spending ain't the cause. Revenue, however...

With the election over, pressure to cut public programs has become quite intense. In almost all of the corporate owned media someone is barking on about it.

Another option -- increasing revenue from corporations and the wealthy is not mentioned.  However, data clearly indicates that Ontario does not have an overspending problem compared to the other provinces.

Instead, it indicates Ontario has very low revenue. 
Ontario has the lowest public spending of all the provinces on a per capita basis (see the chart from the 2014 Ontario Budget below).  So there is little reason to suspect that we have an over-spending problem.  If anything, this suggests we have an under-spending problem.







The Ontario government has also now reported in the 2014 Budget that Ontario has the lowest revenue per capita of any province.  This is particularly notable as other provinces are quite a bit poorer than Ontario and therefore have a much more limited ability to pay for public spending.  (Also notable in this…

Budget underwhelms on health care. Bait and Switch is such a nasty term

Last year the government promised a 4.64% health care funding increase in 2018/19. Then, earlier this month, they announced they would deficit spend to improve hospitals, mental health, home care, and child care.   Three of the four items cited by the government for improvement were part of health care. 

As it turned out the government did in fact promise in today's Budget to deficit spend $6.7 billion. (Due to a $1 billion fall in expected revenue, the extra spend amounts only to an extra $5.7 billion for 2018/19 programs – but that is still a significant chunk of new found cash for program spending.)  
If health care had gotten even a proportionate share of this new $5.7 billion in program spending, it would have added an additional $2.4 billion to health care  --  in other words about another 4% increase.  

But all health care got -- despite the government’s health care rhetoric -- was an extra $284 million. That may sound like a lot but with a total health care spend of $61 bill…

Ford government promise falls far short of solving hospital hallway medicine problem

Tens of thousands of new Long-Term Care (LTC) beds needed just to offset aging
The new Progressive Conservative government in Ontario has promised 30,000 new long-term care beds over the next ten years, often connecting this to their promise to end hospital hallway medicine.  But how does this promise stack up with growing demand for these facilities?
Most people 85 and older live in collective dwellings (LTC facilities, seniors residences, multiple level of care facilities).  The setting with the largest number of elders 85 and older is LTC facilities, with about 35% of the population 85 to 89  years old and almost 40% of the population 90 to 94 years. Older people are even more likely to be in a LTC facility.
The population 85 and older is the main driver of the need for long-term care beds.
An additional thirty thousand LTC beds by 2028 will only partially offset the rapid growth in the 85+ population.  The ministry of finance projects 42.5% growth in the most relevant population (85 a…