Skip to main content

3000 more hospital beds? Rhetoric falls short of realty with Doug Ford's government

Soon after the Budget, the government announced they would spend $27 billion on hospital infrastructure over ten years and create 3,000 more hospital beds.


For a moment, it may have seemed that we had prized a small victory from the Ford government.  The movement did, after all, force them to run on a promise of ending hospital hallway healthcare, and squeezed out a bit more in-year funding for hospitals last fall.  

Unfortunately, as with so much from this government, the rhetoric does not match the reality.  Here's why this is much less than it might appear on first blush.

[1] While the government promises to “create” 3,000 more beds over ten years, they do not promise that the hospitals will operate 3,000 more beds than they currently do. There is no promise to increase hospital bed capacity. 

There isn't even a promise to have 3,000 more spaces for beds.  As our hospitals are aging, spaces for some existing beds will no longer be usable in ten years. Will they be replaced?  The announcement doesn't say.  So it is not at all clear from this announcement how many usable spaces for beds will exist ten years from now.   

As will be discussed in next week's post, the provincial government is cutting the real funding for hospital operations -- so it is quite possible, or even likely, that hospitals will cut staff, and with that, the operation of some beds. As has already been happening for years, hospitals will have to ship patients out quicker and sicker.   

So 3,000 new spaces for beds may be created in ten years, but there is no promise that there will be 3,000 more spaces for beds, much less that 3,000 more beds will be open and in operation

[2] Even if the government was actually promising to operate 3,000 more hospital beds that would not create enough new beds to keep up with population growth and aging. By our estimate, those factors will mean operating hospital beds will have to expand by 6,000 just to keep existing service levels. In other words, the Conservatives are actually promising to reduce capacity relative to population by about 3,000 beds -- almost a 10% cut. This is similar to the PC announcement for new LTC beds – a promise which also does not keep up with aging and population growth -- except the cut relative to population for the hospital sector is even larger. 

[3] The projects will be developed through privatized P3s in many cases. This system has been consistently shown to waste tax dollars. Approximately $8 billion has been wasted on over-priced P3 risk transfers.

[4] The last Liberal Budget (2018/19) revealed that the Liberals spent $2.74 billion in 2017/18 on hospital infrastructure and planned to spend another $2.74 billion in 2018/19. The new annual average spend for the next ten years is supposed to be $2.7 billion – almost as much as the Liberals budgeted for the last two years. But, over ten years, the PC promise of $2.7 billion will be worth significantly less than what it is currently worth due to inflation.  So this will be a decrease in spending. A larger and older population in the province will also reduce the impact of the spending.

[5] The PC 2019/20 Budget reports that they actually only spent $2.63 billion in 2018/19, about a hundred million less than the Liberals’ Budget plan.  

[6] For 2019/20, the PCs plan to spend only $2.36 billion.  This is the only estimate that counts for very much, as the government can easily change their promised spending with every Budget. (Indeed the 2019 Budget does not even commit to a specific hospital infrastructure spend in 2020/21). As noted, $2.36 billion is less than what has been Budgeted in recent years -- and $380 million less than what the Liberals spent the last year they ruled the roost.

[7]  The total spend over the last ten years on hospital capital projects has been reported in Budgets at $27.5 billion - - a little bit more in nominal terms than the PCs plan for the next ten years, but much more than the PCs plan once inflation and population growth are factored in.  

[8] It is also noteworthy that for the five years 2011-12 through 2015-16, the Liberals actually spent almost $3 billion a year on hospital infrastructure, significantly more than the average annual spend the PCs project for the next ten years, even in nominal dollars. Notably, just at the conclusion of this five year five year period, the Auditor General reported (in late 2016) that hospital infrastructure spending was falling far short of need. Click here for more details. 

Bottom line: our hospital bed capacity problem is set to get worse, not better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More spending on new hospitals and new beds? Nope

Hospital funding:  There is something off about the provincial government's Budget claims on hospital capital funding (funding to build and renovate hospital beds and facilities).    For what it is worth (which is not that much, given the long time frame the government cites), the province claims it will increase hospital capital spending over the next 10 years from $11 billion to $20 billion – or on average to about $2 billion per year.   But, this is just a notional increase from the previous announcement of future hospital capital spending.  Moreover, even if we did take this as a serious promise and not just a wisp of smoke, the government's own reports shows they have actually funded hospital infrastructure about $3 billion a year over the 2011/12-2015/16 period. So this “increase” is really a decrease from past actual spending. Even last year's (2016-17) hospital capital funding increase was reported in this Budget at $2.3 billion - i.e. about 15% more th

Ford government fails to respond to 72% increase in COVID inpatient days, deepening the capacity crisis

COVID infections continue to drive up hospital costs and inpatient hospitalizations in Ontario. For the most recent fiscal year (April 1, 2022- March 31, 2023) hospital stays related to COVID cost $1.221 billion, according to new CIHI data.   This is about 4% of total hospital spending, creating a very significant new cost pressure beyond the usual pressures of population growth, aging, inflation, and rising utilization.   Costs for COVID related hospitalizations increased 22.2% in Ontario in 2022/23 from the previous fiscal year, rising from $999 million to $1.221 billion.  That rise is particularly notable as the OMICRON spike of late 2021 and early 2022 had passed by the the 2022/23 fiscal year.   The $222 million increase in COVID hospitalization costs came in the same year as the Ford government cut special COVID funding and, in fact, cut total hospital funding by $156 million.     In total, there were 60,653 COVID hospitalizations in Ontario in 2022/3, up from 47,543 in 2021/2. 

Paramedic Services in Canada: Structure, Privatization, Unionization and other issues

Governance and Funding :  While police and fire services are usually municipal services, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are typically controlled by provincial governments.  In Ontario, regional municipal governments have responsibility for delivering and funding EMS.  But even in Ontario the province plays a key role, strictly regulating EMS, providing funding for 50% of the approved land ambulance costs, and paying 100% of the approved costs for air ambulance, dispatch, base hospitals, First Nation EMS, and for territories without municipal government. Delivery :  Like police and fire services, EMS is predominantly a publicly provided service in Canada.   But businesses have now made some significant in-roads into EMS, primarily  Medavie,  a private corporation based in the Maritimes that describes itself as not-for-profit.  Medavie goes back over 70 years, with its roots in health insurance.  It still operates Medavie Blue Cross with 1,900 employees.  It now a